Integrating plant science research in other scientific fields

The concept of ‘interdisciplinarity’ has emerged as a salient term within the scientific discourse, signifying an escalated interest in both the promotion of interdisciplinary methodologies and the evaluation of their efficacy. The scientific community increasingly recognizes interdisciplinary collaboration as a vital enhancement to scientific inquiry and a judicious career maneuver, receiving substantial support from funding agencies and policymakers. This is exemplified by the dedicated issue on interdisciplinary research published by Nature in 2015 and the thematic emphasis at the 5th annual meeting of the Global Research Council. Nation-states have implemented specific policy measures to underwrite interdisciplinary research endeavors, exemplified by the establishment of programs such as the National Academies Keck Futures Initiative (NAKFI) and the Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT). Moreover, the European Research Council (ERC) has garnered attention for endorsing “Frontier Research” proposals that venture beyond the confines of established disciplinary parameters.

Interdisciplinary research confers a multitude of advantages, acting as a pivotal conduit for the generative recombination processes that propel scientific advancement (Rafols et al., 2012). The multifaceted issues such as climate change and resource security necessitate a confluence of expertise from the biological, physical, and social sciences (Rylance, 2015; Yegros-Yegros et al., 2015). Innovation is frequently incubated at the nexus of diverse disciplines, a space where the introduction of novel methodologies, theoretical perspectives, and insights has the potential to fundamentally alter or refine our collective understanding. The transformative influence of big data analytics across a spectrum of scientific fields illustrates the substantial impact of such interdisciplinary engagements (Rylance, 2015). However, it is important to acknowledge the challenges associated with interdisciplinary research. (Yegros-Yegros et al., 2015) identify two primary categories of costs: those related to the additional resources and effort required for coordination, and those stemming from a lack of recognition for the research.

The economic ramifications of interdisciplinary research are complex, encompassing direct costs like administrative and travel expenses, as well as less overt outlays due to the synchronization of disparate organizational cultures and the creation of a common vocabulary, as noted by scholars such as Cummings & Kiesler (2005), Rafols (2007), and Yegros-Yegros et al. (2015). The structural context of institutions exacerbates these financial burdens, presenting obstacles including limited career paths, diminished academic recognition, hurdles in publication, and biases in peer review, as documented by Bruce et al. (2004), Llerena & Meyer-Krahmer (2003), and Rafols (2007). Furthermore, interdisciplinary research often faces diminished esteem due to the prevalence of disciplinary silos, which marginalize unconventional methods and theories (Barry et al., 2008), and the assessment of such work is frequently skewed by traditional disciplinary prejudices, complicating the development of fair evaluation standards (Mallard et al., 2009; Yegros-Yegros et al., 2015). Additionally, interdisciplinary projects tend to be at a disadvantage in securing funding and may experience inconsistent citation impacts (Bromham et al., 2016; Porter & Rafols, 2009).

Continue to read at